Sometimes though、Watch videos of helping animals。abandoned on the side of the road、A kitten on the verge of starvation due to malnutrition.、A statue or a deer stuck in the mud、Snakes and turtles that are unable to eat after swallowing foreign objects such as plastic、Seagulls, birds of prey, etc. who are unable to catch fish due to fishing line entangled in their legs.、There are various ways in which animals die.、Regarding things caused by humans、When you see images of people helping people、There's something about it that makes me feel relieved。
Wild carnivores cannot survive without hunting.。If a golden eagle does not eat 1 kg of meat every day, its body will become weak.、lost the power to fly、In the end, I have no choice but to die。Like procuring it at a butcher shop.、I wish I had exactly 1 kg of meat every day.、That doesn't happen in the wild environment.。In order to reach today's 1 kg of meat、Even if the opponent is a wolf weighing 50 kg, there is no other way to live than to challenge.。The wolf is also hungry、If you don't eat meat, even if it's only 1kg、There is nothing that guarantees me tomorrow.。Both sides are really desperate。It's literally a fight to eat or be eaten.、This is not a "fight" in the human sense.。A conflict is a ``battle over interests'' between ``the same species.''。No matter how intense it is from a human perspective,、It is nothing more than a "feeding" behavior.。
we humans、Like wild carnivores, they roam around in search of prey every day.、Being attacked by a prey animal while hunting、without risking serious, near-fatal injury、As long as you have the money, you can get as much meat as you want, whether it's 1kg or 10kg.。This is thanks to something called "civilization" that only humans were able to obtain.。
動物と人類との大きな違いは「貯金・貯蓄」であるともよく言われるが、確かにそうかもと思うところがある。（肉食）動物の一部には、クマヤトラなど死骸に草や土をかけ、他の動物から隠して数日間の狩猟のリスクを下げる「備蓄」的な行動をとるものもあるそうだ。Apparently, the questioner thinks that "the concrete result of sketching" brings fun.、大体はほぼ他の動物との分け合いになる。他の動物もまた、生きるのに必死だから。
ヒトだけが戦争をする。戦争をする理由は「どうしたら貯金・貯蓄」をより大きくできるか、is。自分だけが、より「豊かで、安全に」暮らすためにはより大きな蓄えと、他人をできるだけ遠くへ（できれば永遠に）追いやることが（本能的にも）効果的だ、と感じられるのだろう。「安全保障」という名の縄張り争いの、最終的なゴールだ。
文明によって作り出された「富（豊かさ）、安全」というイメージ、それを「発展」させることが「文化」の使命であり、その論理の先に戦争が生み出されたのだとすれば、矛盾であるだけでなく、それ以上に滑稽でさえある。その「文化」が、一方で戦争ををストップさせようともがいている図は、確かにシビアな問題ではあるが、俯瞰的に見れば自分の尻尾を自分が追いかけているような、馬鹿馬鹿しくも哀しい、人類の終末を見ているような気分にもなる。
