I will post three of the same hydrangea prototypes.。1 from the top、２、I'll call it 3、Each drawing is slightly different。3Same paper for both sheets、The photos were supposed to be taken under the same lighting conditions.、For some reason, only the first sheet has a different color of paper.。certainly、The color of the flower is also 2，It should be different from 3。I wonder why?。
1 is mainly a drawing。2 is mainly based on color、Or rather, there are almost no drawings.。3 is almost in between。Looking at it this way, what I feel is the most "painterly" is 2.。Apart from the "plant species" called hydrangea、Because there is a strong degree of "model-oriented" focus on color (including brightness and darkness) and form.。I guess it's a hydrangea because it's lined up.、If you look at 2 alone, it would be 50/50 whether or not it would be recognized as a hydrangea.。If you press one more step、No one will be able to immediately identify it as a hydrangea.。
This is how I feel (currently)、Each person who sees it can feel it as they see fit.。However、Even in that case、Analytical distinctions like those mentioned above (1 is a drawing) must be made (the analytical factors can be set freely by each individual).。because、That's because that's the way you look at things.。The more original the factor is, the more、I think it means that you have a unique perspective (analytical ability).。In this case, it can be said to be an individual filter.、Even with a sieve、Even if you say it with colored glasses, the content remains the same.。
same motif、For example, if you try creating something by changing the expression like this,、It becomes an effective process to deepen the quality of painting.。Not expression (law)、Changing the idea has also been practiced for a long time (in painting, this is called phase transformation/variation).。(I wonder if musical “variations” also mean the same thing.)。
In painting, the motif is ``what to draw?''、There was once (apparently) a debate over ``how to draw'' that centered on concept and expression.。I'm from the next generation、Apart from the concept of the time、When I was young, I thought that ``what to draw = the theme'' was important.。At the time, I believed that paintings still had the power to convey social messages.。
now? -I believe that the ``historical life of painting'' has already run out.、I think that。But at the same time、I also think that painting is not finished yet (afterglow?)。I will omit the explanation、I think that's the difference between humans and AI or robots.、I guess I'll just say。