最近のことを考えてみると、マッチポンプだらけと言っていいような状況に見える。「火付け役」が「起業（家）」、「陰謀」が「共有」「メディア」が「煽り役」と役どころの名前を変えると、そんな風に見えてくる。However、それが複数であり、演者も自覚なしに演じてしまっていたりと、“ステルス”化している。on the other hand、YouTube動画や tiktok、インスタグラム等、こちらは皆自作自演である。マッチポンプとは言われないが、良い意味？でそれが普通になり始めている。
but、こちらの「自作自演」は基本文字通りのフリーランスであり、メディアに乗れば歓迎される一方で、現実の負担はかなり厳しいものがある。tokyo2020で金メダリストになったスケートボードの選手たちの、そこへ至るまでの道のりの厳しさはすでにある程度知られているだろう。But、彼らの前にその道へ一歩踏み出した人がいることを忘れてはならない。道をたどり、道を広げるのももちろん大変だが、最初の一歩もそれに劣らない、It is a sport that is firmly connected to the essence of current sports.。マッチの火をつけることがいかに大変か。ポンプまでいけば、なかば成功したも同然だと思う。
Once upon a time, it was said that ``Indians don't lie.''、I remember there was a commercial for candy or something.。That means "I don't lie"、I remember it becoming a buzzword today.。
"Don't lie to computers" is not a buzzword、Common sense “was”。Computers don't make mistakes。The apology text "Due to a computer error"、Engineers would always complain that it was due to a (human) input error.。Regardless of the amount of ability、There was absolute trust in the accuracy and speed of computers.。
The past tense of “was” and “was” is、Because computers can now tell lies with ease.。I wrote about “Chat GPT” a while ago.。The height of that ability、This time, it seems that he has proven it again by "lying" (in the context of news)、He introduced this as an example of his ability being still low.)。(According to the person?) Can also be translated as “ability to appropriately deceive”。or、Computers “intentionally select” data on their own、They are acquiring the ability to "hide"、What if I rephrase it as。
No matter how knowledgeable a person is、Human knowledge usually has limitations and biases.。Of course I'm asking because it's something I don't know much about.、By incorporating appropriate knowledge、If you can explain it in a way that makes sense、It's not easy to tell if it's a lie or fact.。Moreover,、It's scary that when a mistake is pointed out, they apologize for cutting corners.。Artificial intelligence research seems to be a race to develop at breakneck speed all over the world.、You may have already opened a ``Pandora's Box'' that should not be opened.。computers eliminate humans、The world of science fiction has become reality、I hope this isn't the first evidence。
Don't just bet money、How many people have the extreme experience of "risking their life" or "risking their life"?。1%?、I thought it would be less, about 0.001%.、If you think about it, almost 100% of people、I wonder if I'll actually experience it、I came up with this idea。
for example marriage。Exchange of information that is acceptable to some extent、Even if you go through the process and end up getting married,、"Others are strangers"。From what you know about the other person、There's probably a lot more that we don't know、Somewhere along the line, you decide "Hey!"。And、Basically, we will spend our lives together、It's no exaggeration to say that you're betting your life on it.。especially in rural areas、For a woman to marry into the family of her eldest son (the word "totsugu" itself indicates its meaning), I think this decision is more than "jumping off the stage of Shimizu."。For lazy people like me、His decisiveness alone is astonishing.。
wake up in the morning、make rice、eat、go to work or school。On the way home, I shopped at the supermarket and made dinner.、eat、do the dishes。for tomorrow、I have no choice but to take a bath and go to bed.。Even such a “daily life” can be suddenly cut off.、Even if you don't listen to the news, it's everywhere.。Many people think, "Isn't that a special case?"、I'm happy because it proves that "human beings" have "culture".、This is not the case with animals (other than humans).。A mother who is raising children、Being eaten by other animals while searching for food is ``part of nature.''。Because that's "everyday life"、At least for animals (other than humans), "every day is a matter of life" must be a reality.。
But、For animals, risking their lives is not a gamble.。No matter how life-threatening it is、It's "everyday life"。For "bet"、You need to be willing to bet on it.。If I fail, I lose something.、Unless you are conscious of the ``difference'' between something and what you are betting on.、it's not a bet。In other words, whether there is a "risk awareness" or not.。リスクと利益の計算を、一定の根拠に基づいて行動に移すこと。それが「賭け」だとしたら、人間なら、生まれてこのかた、ずっと賭け人生だと言ってよいのではないか。違いがあるのは根拠の確かさと失敗したときの覚悟だけ。Maybe、その覚悟の有無だけを人は賭けと呼んでいるのかもしれないが。
