Two classes of blue seagull painting class、Mr. S takes one sheet from his personal practice book.、Mr. T picked up two photos from the sketch session the other day.。
Mr. S's watercolor sketch、I may have chosen a difficult subject.。I was also shown the actual motif.、It was almost like this。with a subtle color gradation、Moreover, the design is somewhat drone-like.。To put it simply, the design is not very good.、It's not S's fault。Moreover, I didn't choose it for the purpose of drawing it.、I drew what I bought because I needed it.。well drawn。Materials like this、I have started to carve out time and steadily use it as my practice base.。Continuation is power、you should definitely experience。
In Mr. T's sketch、It's as fun as a child's drawing.。Personally anyway、The drawing style seems to ignore perspective at first glance.、It strongly brings out that feeling.。Maybe it's because I haven't developed a solid sense of perspective drawing.、If it were drawn in a neat and accurate drawing method,、As for whether this fun (or should I call it a mysterious spatial experience?) will come out even more?、Maybe it's the opposite。The depth of painting actually lies in this、It is a sport that is firmly connected to the essence of current sports.。
Photo-accurate depiction、Correct understanding of techniques, illustrations, color theory, etc.、That was certainly a necessary condition to convince people.。At least until modern times when many people were relatively "ignorant"、This is because part of the role of painting was to “educate” through visual perception.。It is natural that education will not have persuasive power without "objectivity".。
However,、In modern times, people say, ``Humans seem to understand things very well.''、In fact, it is a (strange) creature that has some aspects that are not well understood.、I understand more than before。The deeper we understand humans、On the other hand, the mystery has become rather deeper.。To put it in a slightly extreme way,、tomorrow、what do you think、I won't know until the time comes。This may also mean that the boundary between "objectivity" and "subjectivity" is once again becoming blurred.。
In such human understanding,、「人間の物の見え方は透視図法だけが正しい」などと主張する方が「正しくなさそう」である。透視図法や写真的正確さは、比較的説得力のあるひとつの表現法だ、と考えておくのがせいぜいで、そこにこだわって良し悪しを判断するのは適切ではなかろう。もちろんSさん、Tさんの描き方が正しいという言い方も、同様の意味でおかしい。―これは確かにわたしの絵だけれど、まだ「わたしはわたし」と言い切るまでの自信はないわ、とそれぞれの絵が小声で語っているのも正直で好ましい。
